Development and validation of a new stability indicating RP-UFLC method for the estimation of Bosentan
Kalyani Lingamaneni*, Mukthinuthalapati Mathrusri Annapurna
Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis & Quality Assurance, Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management (Deemed to be University), GITAM Institute of Pharmacy, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-530045, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: kalyani.lingamaneni@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
A new stability-indicating RP-UFLC method has been developed for the estimation of Bosentan in pharmaceutical dosage forms and the method was validated. Bosentan is used to lower the high blood pressure in lungs (pulmonary arterial hypertension). Bosentan acts by blocking the actions of endothelin -1and thereby lowers the blood pressure. Mobile phase mixture consisting of sodium acetate (pH 5.0) buffer solution and acetonitrile (50: 50 v/v) with flow rate 0.7 mL/min were the optimized chromatographic conditions (Detection wavelength 254 nm) for the present study. Linearity was observed in the concentration range of 0.1–100 μg/mL (R2 = 0.9998) with regression equation y = 126698 x – 392.49. The LOQ was found to be 0.08964 µg/mL and the LOD was found to be 0.02913 µg/mL. Stress degradation studies such as acidic, alkaline, oxidation, photolysis and thermal degradations were performed by exposing Bosentan and finally the proposed method was validated as per ICH guidelines. The assay of Bosentan was conducted by applying the proposed method to the marketed formulations. The proposed method is simple, specific, precise, and accurate and can be applied for the estimation of pharmaceutical formulations.
KEYWORDS: Bosentan, RP-UFLC, Stability-indicating, Validation, ICH.
INTRODUCTION:
Bosentan (Figure 1) is chemically, 4-tert-butyl-N-[6-(2-hydroxyethoxy) -5- (2-methoxyphenoxy) -2- (pyrimidin-2-yl) pyrimidin-4-yl] benzene-1 sulfonamide1. Bosentan is used to lower the pulmonary hypertension by blocking the action of endothelin-1 molecules responsible for narrowing the blood vessels and elevates high blood pressure2-3. Different analytical techniques such as Spectrophotometry4-8, HPTLC9, LC-MS10-14 and reverse phase liquid chromatography15-22 have been developed for the determination of Bosentan in biological fluids, dosage forms as well as its impurities and degradation products. In the present study a new simple stability indicating RP-UFLC method was proposed for the determination of Bosentan and in its tablet dosage forms and the method was validated as per ICH guidelines.
Figure 1: Structure of Bosentan
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Acetonitrile (HPLC grade), sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) and Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were obtained from Merck (India). Bosentan API was obtained from LUPIN Ltd (India), a pharmaceutical company as gift sample. Bosentan is available in pharmacy store with brand names BOSENTAS (62.5 mg and 125 mg) (CIPLA Ltd, India) and BOZETAN (62.5 mg and 125 mg) (LUPIN Ltd, India) and all other chemicals were of AR grade and used as received.
Chromatographic separation was achieved by using a Shimadzu Model CBM-20A/20 Alite HPLC system, equipped with PDA detector and Phenomenex C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm particle size) maintained at 25 ºC. Isocratic elution was performed using Sodium acetate buffer: Acetonitrile (50:50, v/v) with flow rate 0.7 mL/min. 20 µL of sample was injected into the UFLC system.
Preparation of Bosentan drug solution
Stock solution of Bosentan (1000 μg/mL) was prepared by weighing accurately 25 mg of Bosentan and dissolving in HPLC grade acetonitrile in a 25 mL volumetric flask. The working standard solutions were prepared from the stock solution on dilution with mobile phase [Sodium acetate buffer: Acetonitrile (50:50, v/v)] and the solutions were filtered filtered through 0.45 μm membrane prior to injection.
Method validation23
Linearity, Limit of quantification (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD)
The method was validated for linearity, limit of quantitation (LOQ), limit of detection (LOD), precision, accuracy, robustness and selectivity. From the series of Bosentan drug solutions (0.1-100 µg/mL) prepared from the stock solution only 20 µL of each of the solutions were injected (n=3) in to the UFLC system and the area under the curve i.e. peak area observed at the retention time of the chromatogram was noted. The mean peak area was calculated and a calibration curve was drawn by plotting the concentration of the drug solutions on the x-axis and the corresponding mean peak area values on the y-axis.
The limit of quantification (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD) were based on the standard deviation of the response and the slope of the constructed calibration curve (n=3), as described in International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use.
Precision, Accuracy and Robustness
The intra-day and inter-day precision studies were evaluated by carrying out independent assays of Bosentan at three concentration levels (10, 20 and 50 µg/mL) (n=3) on the same day and also on different days (Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3) respectively and the %RSD of the peak areas obtained was calculated.
The accuracy of the assay method was evaluated in triplicate by standard addition method (80, 100 and 120%) i.e. by the addition of API drug solution to the pre-analyzed formulation and thereby the percentage recovery was calculated. The robustness of the analytical method denotes the ability of the method to remain unaffected by the small and deliberate variations in the method optimized conditions.
The robustness of the method was evaluated by incorporating small changes in the chromatographic conditions such as mobile phase composition (± 2%; 48:52 v/v and 52:48 v/v), detection wavelength (± 2 nm; 252 and 256 nm), pH (± 0.1 unit; 4.9 and 5.1) and flow rate (± 0.1 mL; 0.6 and 0.8 mL/min).
Forced degradation studies24
Forced degradation studies were performed by exposing Bosentan to stress conditions such as acidic (HCl), alkaline (NaOH), oxidation (H2O2) and thermal conditions to evaluate the stability indicating properties and the specificity of the proposed method. The solutions used for the degradation studies were prepared by refluxing Bosentan drug solutions (50 µg/mL) at 70 ºC for 30 min in a thermostat with the reagents as per the degradation study and were filtered before injection in to the UFLC system.
Acidic degradation was performed by treating the Bosentan solution (50 µg/mL) with 0.1 N hydrochloric acid for 30 min in a thermostat maintained at 70 ºC, cooled and then neutralized with sodium hydroxide followed by dilution with mobile phase before injecting in to the UFLC system.
Acidic degradation was performed by treating the Bosentan solution (50 µg/mL) with 0.1 N sodium hydroxide for 30 min in a thermostat maintained at 70 ºC, cooled and then neutralized with hydrochloric acid followed by dilution with mobile phase before injecting in to the UFLC system.
Oxidation degradation was performed by treating the Bosentan solution (50 µg/mL) with 0.1 ml of 30% H2O2 for 30 min in a thermostat maintained at 70 ºC, cooled and then diluted with mobile phase before injecting in to the UFLC system.
Photolytic degradation was performed by exposing the Bosentan solution (50 µg/mL) to UV light (365 nm) in a photo stability testing chamber for 4 hours and then diluted with mobile phase before injecting in to the UFLC system.
Thermal degradation was performed by heating Bosentan drug solution (50 µg/mL) in a thermostat maintained at 70 ºC for 30 mins. The stressed drug solution was cooled and then diluted with mobile phase and injected in to the UFLC system.
Analysis of Bosentan dosage forms (Tablets)
Twenty tablets of each brand were procured from the local market, weighed accurately and crushed in to fine powder. Powder equivalent to 25 mg Bosentan was weighed accurately and transferred into a 25 ml volumetric flask and made up to volume with acetonitrile, sonicated for 30 min, filtered. The filtrate was diluted as per the requirement with mobile phase and 20 µL of the solution was injected in to the UFLC system after filtering through 0.45 μm nylon filter before injection.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
A new stability-indicating RP-UFLC method was proposed for the quantification of Bosentan in pharmaceutical formulations (Tablets). The previously reported liquid chromatographic methods in the literature were compared with the present proposed RP-UFLC method and summarized in Table 1.
HPLC method development and optimization
Initially many trial runs were made with mobile phase consisting of a mixture of sodium acetate (pH 5.0) buffer solution and acetonitrile solution with flow rate 1.0 mL/min. System suitability parameters such as tailing factor, capacity factor, theoretical plates etc were not within the acceptable criteria and therefore the chromatographic conditions were changed and finally mobile phase mixture consisting of sodium acetate (pH 5.0) buffer solution and acetonitrile (50: 50, v/v) with flow rate 0.7 mL/min (Detection wavelength 254 nm) were the optimized chromatographic conditions for the present study. The chromatograms obtained in the trial runs (Figure 2A-2F) and the corresponding chromatographic conditions along with the system suitability parameters were given in Table 2.
Table 1: Literature survey
|
Method / Mobile phase (v/v) |
Comment |
Ref.
|
|
LC-MS-MS |
Bio analytical method |
10 |
|
LC-MS |
Bosentan and its three major metabolites |
11 |
|
LC-MS |
Human plasma |
12 |
|
ESI-MS(n) and LC-ESI-MS 5 mM Ammonium acetate buffer (pH 4.5): Methanol: Acetonitrile |
Stability indicating Characterization of degradants products |
13 |
|
SPE-LC-MS/MS |
Human Plasma Bosentan and its active metabolite Hydroxy Bosentan |
14 |
|
HPLC Methanol: Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate buffer (pH 7.8) (60:40) |
Not stability indicating Retention time: 8.26 min Linearity: 50-150 |
15 |
|
HPLC 10mM Phosphate Buffer (pH 6.0): Acetonitrile (50:50) |
Not stability indicating Retention time: 3.687 min Linearity: 15-27 |
16 |
|
HPLC Acetonitrile: 10 mM Ammonium acetate (pH 4.5) buffer (70:30) |
Not stability indicating Linearity: 5-70 |
17 |
|
UHPLC (Gradient mode) 0.1 % Acetic acid: Methanol |
In process control of Bosentan monohydrate synthesis Linearity: 0.3-200 |
18 |
|
HPLC (Gradient mode) |
Process and degradation impurities |
19 |
|
HPLC |
Related substances |
20 |
|
HPLC |
Plasma |
21 |
|
HPLC (Isocratic mode) Tetra butyl ammonium hydrogen sulphate: Acetonitrile (35: 65) |
Stability indicating Linearity: 1-350 |
22 |
|
UFLC |
Stability indicating Linearity: 0.1-100 |
Present method |
Table 2: Method optimization (Bosentan 10 µg/mL)
|
Trial |
Flow rate (mL/min) |
Mobile phase (Aq: Org) |
Rt (mins) |
Theoretical plates |
Tailing factor |
Observation |
Figure |
|
1 |
1 |
70:30 |
1.303 |
2059 |
1.550 |
Retention time <2 |
2(A) |
|
2 |
0.8 |
70:30 |
1.965 |
2680 |
1.494 |
Retention time <2 |
2(B) |
|
3 |
0.8 |
70:30 |
1.970 |
2606 |
1.491 |
Retention time <2 |
2(C) |
|
4 |
0.5 |
70:30 |
2.808 |
1427 |
1.325 |
Theoretical plates <2000 |
2(D) |
|
5 |
0.6 |
60:40 |
2.698 |
1928 |
1.346 |
Theoretical plates <2000 |
2(E) |
|
6 |
0.7 |
50:50 |
2.262 |
3092 |
1.481 |
Method Optimized |
2(F) |
Figure 2: Chromatograms (Trial runs) observed during method optimization
Method validation
Linearity
Beer-Lambert’s law was obeyed over the concentration range 0.1–100 μg/mL (Table 3) with linear regression equation y = 126698 x – 392.49 and correlation coefficient, R2 = 0.9998 (Figure 3). The chromatograms obtained for the placebo, Bosentan API were shown in Figure 4A-4B. The LOQ was found to be 0.08964 µg/mL and the LOD was found to be 0.02913 µg/mL.
Table 3: Linearity study of Bosentan
|
Conc. (µg/mL) |
*Mean peak area ± SD (n = 3) |
*RSD (%) |
|
0.1 |
12879 ± 32.1975 |
0.25 |
|
0.5 |
65183 ± 337.5424 |
0.26 |
|
1 |
129824 ± 402.4544 |
0.31 |
|
5 |
637825 ± 2870.2125 |
0.45 |
|
10 |
1274643 ± 5480. 9649 |
0.43 |
|
20 |
2516372 ± 12078.5856 |
0.48 |
|
40 |
5047896 ± 9591.0024 |
0.19 |
|
50 |
6410437 ± 45514.1027 |
0.71 |
|
60 |
7598263 ± 52428.0147 |
0.69 |
|
80 |
9987634 ± 53933.2236 |
0.54 |
|
100 |
12761852 ± 116132.8532 |
0.91 |
*Mean of three replicates
Figure 3: Calibration curve of Bosentan
Figure 4A: Placebo
Figure 4B: Typical chromatogram of Bosentan API (10 μg/mL)
(Rt 2.262 min; Theoretical plates 4192; Tailing factor 1.231)
Figure 4C: Typical chromatogram of Bosentan tablet (10 μg/mL) (Rt 2.180 min; Theoretical plates 2730; Tailing factor 1.441)
Precision, Accuracy and Robustness
The % RSD in precision studies was found to be 0.74-0.91 (Intra-day) and 1.02-1.38 (Inter-day) (<2.0 %) (Table 4) and 0.38-0.72 in accuracy studies (<2.0 %) (% Recovery 98.56-98.97) indicating that the proposed RP-UFLC method is precise and accurate. The % RSD value in the robustness study was found to be 0.39-0.1.21 which is less than 2.0% indicating that the method is robust (Table 5).
Table 4: Precision and accuracy studies of Bosentan
|
Conc. (µg/mL) |
Intra-day precision |
Inter-day precision |
||
|
*Mean peak area ± SD (% RSD) |
*Mean peak area ± SD (% RSD) |
|||
|
10 |
1271987 ± (0.74) |
1281895 ± 13075.33 (1.02) |
||
|
20 |
2498361 ± (0.91) |
2532478 ± 31149.48 (1.23) |
||
|
50 |
6398521 ± (0.76) |
6425136 ± 88666.88 (1.38) |
||
|
Accuracy |
||||
|
Conc. (µg/mL) |
*Mean peak area ± SD (% RSD) |
*Drug found (µg/mL) |
% Recovery |
|
|
18 |
2247421 ± 16181.43 (0.72) |
17.743 |
98.56 |
|
|
20 |
2507551 ± 9528.69 (0.38) |
19.795 |
98.97 |
|
|
22 |
2747978 ± 16762.67 (0.61) |
21.69 |
98.60 |
|
*Mean of three replicates
Table 5: Robustness study of Bosentan (10 μg/mL)
|
S. No |
Parameter |
Condition |
*Mean peak area |
Statistical analysis Mean peak area ± SD (% RSD) |
|
1 |
Flow rate (mL/min) |
0.6 |
1275598 |
1269760.67 ± 15364.10 (1.21) |
|
0.7 |
1264731 |
|||
|
0.8 |
1268953 |
|||
|
2 |
Detection wavelength (± 2 nm) |
252 |
1274602 |
1274528.67 ± 9304.06 (0.73) |
|
254 |
1273999 |
|||
|
256 |
1274985 |
|||
|
3 |
Mobile phase (Sodium acetate buffer: Acetonitrile) |
52:48 |
1272879 |
1273043 ± 4964.87 (0.39) |
|
50:50 |
1273102 |
|||
|
48:52 |
1272984 |
|||
|
4 |
pH (± 0.1unit) |
4.9 |
1272936 |
1273684 ± 13883.16 (1.09) |
|
5.0 |
1274219 |
|||
|
5.1 |
1273897 |
*Mean of three replicates
Assay of Bosentan tablets
The proposed method was applied to the marketed formulations i.e. tablets (Figure 4C) for carrying out the assay of Bosentan and the % recovery was found to be 98.29- 99.13 (Table 6).
Table 6: Assay of Bosentan tablets
|
Sample No. |
Formulation |
Labeled claim (mg) |
*Amount found (mg) |
*Recovery (%) |
|
1 |
Brand I |
125 |
122.86 |
98.29 |
|
2 |
Brand II |
125 |
123.91 |
99.13 |
*Mean of three replicates
Forced degradation studies
The representative chromatograms obtained during the forced degradation studies were shown in Figure 5. A very slight decomposition i.e. less than 12 % was observed during the acidic, alkaline, oxidation, thermal and photolytic degradation conditions indicating that the drug is very much resistant (Table 7). The system suitability parameters such as tailing factor (<1.5-2.0), capacity factor and theoretical plates (>2000) were within the acceptable criteria.
Table 7: Forced degradation studies of Bosentan (50 μg/mL)
|
Stress Conditions |
*Mean peak area |
Retention time (min) |
*Drug recovered (%) |
*Drug decomposed (%) |
Theoretical plates |
Tailing factor |
|
Standard Drug |
6410698 |
2.226 |
100 |
0 |
3894 |
1.123 |
|
Acidic degradation |
5649874 |
2.234 |
88.13 |
11.87 |
3256 |
1.386 |
|
Alkaline degradation |
5712896 |
2.219 |
89.11 |
10.89 |
2356 |
1.319 |
|
Oxidation degradation |
6103172 |
2.240 |
95.20 |
4.80 |
3129 |
1.123 |
|
Thermal degradation |
6409773 |
2.226 |
99.99 |
0.01 |
3746 |
1.328 |
|
Photolytic degradation |
6371051 |
2.224 |
99.38 |
0.62 |
2257 |
1.417 |
*Mean of three replicates
Figure 5: Typical chromatograms of Bosentan (50 μg/mL) during stress degradation studies
CONCLUSIONS:
The proposed stability-indicating RP-UFLC method for the determination of Bosentan was sensitive, selective and specific and no excipients interfere with the Bosentan drug peak during the assay. The proposed stability-indicating RP-UFLC method is precise, accurate and robust and can be applied successfully to perform stability studies and pharmacokinetic studies.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
The authors are grateful to Lupin Ltd (India) for providing the gift samples of Bosentan.
REFERENCES:
1. O' Neil MJ. The Merck Index. An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drug and Biologicals. 2006.
2. Weber C, Gasser R, Hopfgartner G. Absorption, excretion, and metabolism of the endothelin receptor antagonist Bosentan in healthy male subjects. Drug Metab Dispos. 1999, 27: 810-815.
3. Weber C, Schmitt R, Birnboeck H, Hopfgartner G. Pharmaco kinetics and pharmaco dynamics of the endothelin-receptor antagonist Bosentan in healthy human subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1996, 60: 124-137.
4. Mathrusri Annapurna M, Bisht SPS, Ravi Kumar BVV. Spectrophotometric determination of Bosentan and its application in pharmaceutical analysis. Int J Comprehensive Pharmacy. 2011; 2: 1-3.
5. Souvik Das, Narendra A, Raja Kumar V and Mathrusri Annapurna M. Validated new spectrophotometric methods for the estimation of Bosentan in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form. J Pharm Educ Res. 2010; 1: 73-76.
6. Ashok Kumar A, Anil Kumar A and Gouri Sankar D. Development, estimation and validation of Bosentan in bulk and in its pharmaceutical formulation by UV-Vis Spectroscopic method. Int J Pharm and Bio Sci. 2011; 2: 225-230.
7. Dhiraj Kumar, Sreenivas SA, Himansu Bhusan Samal, Suddhasattya Dey, Priyanka Y. Method development and estimation of Bosentan monohydrate in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms using UV-Visible spectrophotometer. J Pharm Res. 2011; 4: 1713- 1715.
8. Narendra A, Deepika D and Mathrusri Annapurna M. New spectrophotometric method for the determination of Bosentan – An anti-hypertensive Agent in pharmaceutical dosage forms. E- Journal of Chemistry. 2012; 9(2): 700-704.
9. Suganthi A, Sai Lakshmi CH. Development and validation of UV spectroscopic and HPTLC methods for the determination of Bosentan from tablet dosage form. Sch. Acad. J. Pharm. 2014; 3(2): 123-127.
10. Dell D, Lausecker B, Hopfgartner G, Giersbergen PLMV and Dingemanse J. Evolving bio analytical methods for the cardiovascular drug Bosentan. Chromatographia. 2002, 55, Supplement 1, S115-S119.
11. Lausecker B, Hess B, Fiscer G, Mueller M and Hopfgartner G. Simultaneous determination of Bosentan and its three major metabolites in various biological matrices and species using narrow bore liquid chromatography with ion spray tandem mass spectrometric detection. J Chromatogra B. Biomedical Sciences and Applications. 2000; 749: 67-83.
12. Lausecker B, Hopfgartner G. Determination of an endothelian receptor against in human plasma by narrow bore liquid chromatography and ion-spray tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 1995; 712: 75-83.
13. Bansal G, Singh R, Saini B, Bansal Y. ESI-MS (n) and LC-ESI-MS studies to characterize forced degradation products of Bosentan and a validated stability-indicating LC-UV method. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2012; 72: 186-197.
14. Parekh JM, Shah DK, Sanyal M, Yadav M and Shrivastav PS. Development of an SPE-LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of Bosentan and its active metabolite hydroxybosentan in human plasma to support a bioequivalence study. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2012; 70(1): 462-470.
15. Karnaker Reddy T, Younus Md, Ravindra Reddy Y, Ashwini Kumar G, Sravan S. RP-HPLC method development and validation of Bosentan drug present in tablets. Int J Pharm Tech. 2010; 2: 577-587.
16. Sai Koushik O., Himaja V, Srinivasa Babu P, Ramadoss K. Development and validation of novel RP-HPLC Method for estimation of Bosentan in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2015; 8(12): 1653-1661.
17. Selvadurai M, Jaya Raja K. Simple estimation of Bosentan in tablet formulation by RP-HPLC. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2012; 3(1): 715-718.
18. Jatczak, M., Sidoryk, K., Kossykowska, M. et al. Development and validation of a UHPLC UV method for the in-process control of Bosentan monohydrate synthesis. Chromatographia. 2016; 79: 1131–1141.
19. Sanjay AJ, Shashikant BL, Sonali LJ, Navanath CN, Saroj RB and Vijayavitthal TM. Stability-indicating gradient RP-LC Method for the determination of process and degradation impurities in Bosentan monohydrate: An endothelin receptor antagonist. Chromatography Research International. 2011; Article ID 929876: 1-9.
20. Vijaya Kumar, Koteswara Satya Avinash Prabhakar E. HPLC method for the analysis of Bosentan and related substances and use of these substances as reference standards and markers. WO 2010/061210. PCT/GB2009/051474.
21. Chavanpatil MD, Rajeshkumar NV, Gulati A. Determination of endothelin antagonist BMS182874 in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. Die Pharmazie. 2006; 61: 525-527.
22. Mathrusri Annapurna M, Pavani S, Anusha S and Harika M. Validated stability indicating RP-HPLC method for the determination of Bosentan in presence of degradation products. Indo-American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2013; 3(6): 4528-4540.
23. ICH. Validation of analytical procedures: Text and methodology Q2 (R1), International Conference on Harmonization, 2005.
24. ICH. Stability testing of new drug substances and products Q1A (R2), International Conference on Harmonization, 2003.
Received on 10.07.2021 Modified on 23.07.2021
Accepted on 31.07.2021 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2021; 14(8):4445-4451.
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00772